Another deflection, sigh. Can you not answer a single, simple question?
-
-
I am under the impression that CERN is at least worthy of making a desicion, surely they are not on a witch hunt are they? Other scientists within the article reject the prof’s research. I am entitled to agree with the second poster’s point. I think it was a worthy comment.
-
Why did CERN remove the speech from their website so we can’t make up our own minds?
-
Well, true...why did they? I can only comment on the article that you retweeted. If he has been done a disservice maybe the BBC should be questioned - they’ve reported it in this way. Somehow I don’t think they’ll take me seriously if I enquire though. Just a hunch.
-
That's a straw man. Nobody asked you to correct them. However you could easily correct *yourself*. How many tweets have you now sent without ever going to the easily accessible primary source?
-
I am asked why they have removed the speech - I am saying I don’t know. Do you?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Have you read this complete research document as well then Julia?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You folks are also wanting to be triggered by anyone you assume to be a ‘feminist’. That I am not, I don’t agree with positive or negative discrimination. The most capable should do the job male or female - no exceptions.
-
Hmmm...that is exactly what he wrote. So why do you condemn him?
-
The premise of the article is that this is how CERN and other scientists have interpreted his research to the point of actually dropping him. If this is a conspiracy against him then he will have to continue to work to prove his point if the science community r misinterpreting it
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

