I did. I’m not on air right now.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
These silly claims have been made before and they’re nonsense
- End of conversation
-
-
-
Can he provide the evidence for this very wide ranging statement. And as an expert legal aspects, I find it odd that this has only surfaced after 2 years of consideration of 'no deal'. Why not earlier?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Julia for Prime Minister
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think he must have missed the fact that we don't have a respectable government.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
LMAO, he's blocked me - presumably for pointing out earlier today that what he was claiming regarding the GFA was total crap. This excuse of an MP is paid through our taxes, but doesn't have the decency to listen.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You shouldn't laugh at him. - grieve for him, or castigate him !
-
You spelt ‘castrate’ wrong...
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
For those of us that are awake (and the many more finally awakening) and not falling for the Remoaner deceipt, fear & irrational thought shaping.....https://youtu.be/DEynCGIZRes
-
Remember this is what EU thinks the Great British public.....pic.twitter.com/gY9ehCunMT
-
I find it weird that people consider the EU to somehow be a single mind. It is a union of member states and around half a billion people, including “the Great British public.” The EU can’t “think” anything.
-
I hope someone with more patience than me takes the time to point out details of your naivety Mike
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Meanwhile Dominic Grieve continues to spout absolute (remain) garbage.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Where exactly in the Lisbon Treaty is the requirement to leave with a withdrawal agreement? (Not a deal, a deal implies mutual gain.) A50 specifies departure & the aspirations of a withdrawal agreement, nothing more!
-
Exactly: Article 50 itself allows explicitly (unlike the later-invented revocation clause) for it being impossible to agreement, hence the time limit and an explicit statement that after 2 years the treaties simply cease to apply.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.