Just one in 10 British jihadis who have returned to the UK have been prosecuted. And those are just the ones that we KNOW went out to join Islamic State.https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/06/12/just-one-ten-british-jihadis-have-prosecuted-return-uk/ …
-
-
Why should the British tax payer pay for her to be here and her baby? Soft and weak country though we are,we will end up doing it

-
Yes - unborn babies are such a threat. And so lazy - lying around for nine months at a time! Parasites - feeding off their mother; peeing in their own amniotic fluid - disgusting! And trouble makers - all that intrauterine kicking! I wouldn’t let them in the country.
-
The baby is an innocent victim in all of this,but when she went join the enemy she's given up her right to be here.She was 15 not 6 when she made the choice.She has no regrets and who knows what she's done over there.Try telling the parents of our dead soldiers she's coming home!
-
Did you have a handle on everything when you were 15? Slamming the door in someone’s face when they are, perhaps, seeking redemption is a great way to fuel enmity. And whatever anyone thinks, the baby remains an issue. What if it was your daughter? Your potential grandchild?
-
Even now at 19 she says she has no regrets,so she's not learned anything.She's left the country and joined the http://enemy.You don't know what she's done or what's she's capable of.What if it was one of your sons or daughters what's been killed by ISIS?
-
One interview - in a refugee camp - possibly under duress? No basis for crass judgement. There’s lots we don’t know - stuff it would be useful to know. If she’s done bad things she’ll be subject to due process and punished - her unborn child shouldn’t be...
-
She left to join a terrorist organisation when she was almost a young woman.For the safety of our country it's better to be safe than sorry.I've no objection to the child coming over here,just another mouth to feed,but i'm not sure the woman would give her up to go into care.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Why? That means we have to pay for her and her jihadi spawn for life.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Don’t trust the government to lock her up though that’s the problem
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
I want her taken out. That would be the end of it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Problem is she will get a couple of years and then some do Gooder will tell us she has been rehabilitated and then the government will probably give her a million quid for pain and suffering. I don’t want my tax used to pay for her for next 70 years on benefits
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You pay for her incarceration then Julia. I don't want anymore of my taxes spent on people who hate this country or want to kill us. 'I'm sorry I made a mistake' doesn't cut it. We have squaddies living on the streets, poverty all around & you want more spent on this traitor?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
There’s a one in ten chance she may be persecuted, as you’ve just stated Julia. Get real.
-
Prosecuted.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Anyway listen to your show every morning and love your stance on brexit, lets hope it’s delivered
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Then the taxpayer has 2 pay for it let her stay where she is. She give her rights up when she left to fight for terrorists and have there baby's
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Despite your headline that only one in 8 are prosecuted?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.