-
-
Julia relies on shock to try make herself interesting. That, and hate, are the only things she has. She is desperate to be right. But even more desperate to be liked. Sadly, she is fated for neither.
-
No, I don’t rely on either. I don’t have to. Try listening to my radio show. You might learn something.
-
Would it hurt to acknowledge that the march on Saturday was huge and that people have genuine & legitimate concerns about Brexit? Instead you use an abusive hashtag and cast doubt on the numbers.....pic.twitter.com/I6cZhQSyhm
-
What’s abusive about that hashtag? Did your side win the 2016 People’s Vote? No. So what does that make you? Not winners. Did anyone who was on the winning side in 2016 join the march on Saturday? No. So
#LosersMarch is 100% fair and accurate isn’t it? -
How many times have England lost the world cup, and how many have they won? One lost vote means we campaign for another, unlucky , couldn't see it happening if it had been the other way round
#BollockstoBrexit -
You’re welcome to campaign for another vote on the EU - but only AFTER we have enacted the vote we’ve already had. That’s how democracy works.
-
No ta, we are welcome to campaign now. THAT’S democracy Julia. No matter what you may say. Get your voting pencil ready, because this only ends with an awful deal (and GE) or a second referendum.
-
Other outcomes are possible, including a fudge where all different forms of Brexit claim victory but nobody is happy with the result. For me, that would probably be the worst result possible as the full extent of the negative effects of Brexit would take years to come out.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
You want to police our right to wear a
#hijab yet refuse criticism on rting a far right extremist hatepreacher.. classy julia -
No, I don’t want an extremist ideology imposed on little girls.
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
I don't wear one, but I do support Muslim women's right to wear their hijab.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Not policing passing comment. You appear to be loosing your rag, again. Or it could be a story "one so called journalist tweets another so called journalist and gets uppity when a journalist passes comment on her poor choice?" A slow news day.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Perhaps you should try and police what you retweet instead then?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Your comment re “It’s none of your sodding business” is kind of hypocritical Julia? How many cases of you commenting on and/or attempting to “police” what others do or say do you think can be found via your social media/radio broadcasts? Isn’t it yours and Ciarans job?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is a public forum. It’s called Twitter. When you post on here it’s everyone’s business. Which is generally what you seem to want. You can’t have it both ways. More
#cakeism, vicar? - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Haha says the women who wants to police what others wear!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Oh dear, Julia. Embarrassed for you.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The hypocrisy of this tweet & sheer stupidity of it. You are like the Stasi when commenting about other people’s tweets. Putting a statement on a public forum opens it up to public scrutiny & comment. It’s everyone’s sodding business by virtue of you doing so you imbecile.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.