This is a demand I will never understand. We held a binary referendum on the EU precisely because the govt can’t carry out the will of BOTH sides. Leave won, Remain lost. Any deal can’t be a compromise - it must fulfil the will of Leave voters.https://twitter.com/faisalislam/status/1051850844424065025 …
-
-
Actually implementing the immigration restrictions already allowed under EU law?
-
Superb answer!
#VoteLeaveBrokeTheLaw#VoteLeaveLied -
When will you lot understand that we don't care about the numbers(there were misrepresentations on BOTH sides). We don't want to be ruled by Brussels and we want autonomy. That's all. Whatever they are using to brainwash the leftwing middle class is working splendidly.
-
What a piece of stupidity. The very fact that we can invoke Article 50 is proof that we aren't ruled by Brussels and had sovereignty the whole time.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Maybe leaving, but retaining all the benefits of EU membership, just as David Davis promised. LOL.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
EFTA/EEA obviously. Leave the EU (political aspects) but retain most of the economic and trade benefits. A position passionately supported before the EURef by ERG zealot
@OwenPaterson - because (in his words) 4.5m/5m UK jobs depend on the SM. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=cbQBIbP4XZg … -
I thought I was the only one who remembered this! I'd pick WTO above EU but EFTA is far better than both of these options.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
A compromise that Remainers might've implemented: Impose immigration reforms within EU rules (rejected by Blair and Cameron), leverage close vote result to campaign for EU reform & transparency, alongside other dissatisfied members, increase visibility & relevance of MEPs.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That's easy - we'd fight from within, having a position at the top table and taking advantage of large swathes of EU's concern of free movement etc. to make substantive changes and address the concerns that led to the Brexit vote - whilst maintaining full benefits of membership.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It would be throwing some anti immigration sop to the Brexiters. EU would probably agree to a short term limit. After a few years it would be obvious limits are a bad thing. Bingo!
-
We already have that rule but choose not to uphold it
-
Yup. FoM of labour not people. No right to remain if a burden on the state.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Major leave campaigners wanted that sort of deal pre referendum.. You can be as vocal as you like but your version of Brexit was not the only version sold to people that voted leave.https://www.spectator.co.uk/2016/01/what-brexit-would-look-like-for-britain/ …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think even you realise that lots of leave voters thought we'd be getting some sort of Norway option.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
One compromise would be EEA/EFTA membership, another would be to put the final deal to a vote and see if it gained popular endorsement. Hard/no deal Brexit is not compromise in any way, shape or form.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
EFTA
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No but yes but... use capital letters to push your opinion... she talks for a living and trained in giving a response. Her words are fabricated and meaningless.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The Norway Model?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.