Extraordinary. The fire chief in charge of fighting the Grenfell inferno says she wouldn't change the fire brigade’s response - despite the fact that the deadly cladding meant that the standard “Stay Put” policy needlessly cost dozens of lives that night.https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-45666960# …
-
-
Needy Needy Needy
#PeopleLikeYou have no answers when challenged. Nice try. -
This Tweet is unavailable
-
She doesn't need to. She's a Tory. She'll want the blame shifted from the chinless austerity politicians and their profiting business partners, to the working class people who were risking their lives to save other working class people.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
The cause of the disaster was the use of cheap flammable building materials sanctioned by the council. This was an unprecedented fire and LFB had to deal with it best they could. You have shock jock values, a posh Katie Hopkins
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
So still nothing. Your intellectual level is all too obvious.https://twitter.com/GWBridgeUK/status/1045987804281532417?s=19 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not winning any hearts here, Julia dear.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's you who should shush. You rude ignorant person. You clearly listen but fail to understand what he is saying. The stay put policy is right. This was an extraordinary situation. The cladding caused this tragedy NOT the FB.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Listen to your own advice then.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Haha! The truth hurts, huh? ;-)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
I would expect a reasonable grasp of English from a supposed journalist, but maybe less so from one who when making an opinion, fails to substantiate the salience of their qualification to make that opinion.