Cheers Julia
-
-
-
You’re very welcome. Just got a copy of your new updated offensive book - you must come back on my show to chat about it x
-
She called a link I sent about her admired collegue Helen Reece vile because Id unkowingling posted on her http://funeral.How many other funerals if this groups ideology took root LOOK into it many of us have had abuse from.those connected it's targeting the abused ideology
-
Due to misguiding from libertarian Furedi who won't allow ideals other than freerange life..dissmising realities of UK powerful antinchristian war against its offspring as it appears conspiratorial due to his influences he allows only 1songsheet again look into it Barbara hewson
-
Tatchel aaronavitch Milo a promoted crew with no variation in attitude.they have ugly 60s feminism as their throwback ideology tough women men who need pity much gender reversal women children do not come 1st, it is patronising to them ..while abusers deserve protection ideals
-
Partially rooted in the red army on the eastern front..revolutionary communist party . Very odd entryists ....don't just look at their superficial offerings....research...I've evidence if needed..
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Well, it isn’t definitive. It uses the right-wing trope of “free speech”, which isn’t the issue. Of course people have the right to question the burka, or any religious practice; but not compare people to street furniture and criminals. That lacks respect and has consequences.
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
No. We have for many years had legal limits on free speech because of consequence; slander and libel being two examples. Recent breaches of electoral law are another example and incitement to violence another. Consequence must be considered.
-
This Tweet is unavailable
New conversation -
-
-
And yet the article doesn't address the main issue. Nobody has the right not to be offended. True. But there has to be a different standard for State representatives.https://twitter.com/Femi_Sorry/status/1027808153667358720 …
-
Please read the quoted tweet before asking questions like that...
-
Oh I’ve read it but you merely made a claim that the state are there to protect. You distinguish Rowan Atkinson and BJ by their profession. But the freedom to think and to criticise should be applied to all. What about the protection of free speech?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This is all about Brexit the complainers are all Anti Brexiteers trying to stop Boris getting on the leadership ballot paper when May goes (soon hopefully)
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Lots of things offend me, my name in
@churchofengland baptism records against my will, non-medical genital mutilation of kids by faith groups & being called morally disordered just because I’m gay etc. I’m offended, but I move on as the law doesn’t stop me from feeling things.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Good to see Claire Fox on Newsnight & SKY Paper Reviews this week, always measured, thoughtful & intelligent with her responses. Not much of that about!!!

-
What a lovely comment. Appreciated.
-
Credit where it’s due....
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.