Why only a second referendum? Why not keep voting? Best of 5 maybe. And if people don’t accept the result we can always have another referendum.
-
-
Before a referendum govt has a duty to inform the population. Clearly the leaflets were ineffective - even members of ERG were still ignorant of customs union (Dorries) Govt should’ve spent money with AIQ. Can stoke a lot of fear and loathing via these guys.
-
What facts in support of Brexit should they have included? There’s no economics to support Leave. We’re losing rights as a population, so no upside there. The prospect of blue passports..?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
But the leeflit.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Wrong, Julia. The leaflet raises the points made by the Leave campaigns about immigration, future trade deals and the idea that little would change in our relationship with the EU. Just because it concludes with recommending Remain doesn’t make those references go away.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The government leaflet didn’t tell any lies though - seems markedly restrained now.pic.twitter.com/QMlBKjPt1L
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
That’s because (and this shouldn’t really be a shock to you after 2 years) there is no tangible, unarguable benefit to Brexit. What would they have put in the document? ‘We will have blue passports (even though the EU will allow them anyway)’?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It was Legal poundy. Or do you advocate breaking the law to suit.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
