Such threats are slightly curious in that the polling doesn't show an election tomorrow would deliver a Commons any more committed to a hard Brexit than the current one, in fact probably less so.https://twitter.com/JuliaHB1/status/1018834335913381890 …
-
-
a. Fair enough b. Fair enough. c. Cue never-ending debate about what the precise meaning of the "bidding" was as delivered by the people on 23 June 2016. d. Fair enough.
-
Fair enough.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
"MPs asked voters to decide,we decided and now they have to do our bidding whether they agree with it or not" Why is this so hard to understand?
-
It's hard to understand because the referendum did not specify what sort of Brexit was requored, hence people have been arguing endlessly about it since. Also: no coherent hard Brexit plan yet that does not risk crashing economy and/or creating hard Irish border.
-
I can't see where people find any ambiguitypic.twitter.com/XhD3U8ld3f
-
if it was so clear, why were there so many articles like this right after the referendum?https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-eu-referendum-36639261 …
-
This is actual porn for MPs,it's what they should live for,them and their extremely well paid civil servants.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I really really really don't understand why these buffoons can't deliver the result of the people's vote, more commonly known as the referemdum.
-
But they are committed to delivering it: only instruction was to leave. No instruction as to how. Hence articles such as this BBC one shortly after the vote -https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-eu-referendum-36639261 …
-
What no one would have anticipated was the utter disruptive negative bully tactics and negotiating methods used by the EU.
-
No, everyone could – and did – predict that EU would not allow a cherry-picked exit. EU themselves said as much. Not their fault.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I could see it was not a threat. Ms
@JuliaHB1 Gets it Mr Walker does not. The 650 idiots wanted us to vote we did, now they have to sort it. But as i felt they all would be inept at doing so. -
I think we'd all like MPs to sort it out. Problem is there doesn't seem to be a plan that enough of them can agree on, let alone one that would not crash the economy/create a hard Irish border etc. So here we are.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
On C: prior to the referendum they said they would implement what was decided. They have already agreed to do our bidding.
-
Sure, and the bidding was just, "leave the EU'. During the campaign everything from Norway to WTO terms was raised as a possible version of this. Arguments are over how to leave.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Why is it so hard for them to understand? And they're supposed to be the clever ones!!
-
Understand *what*?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Lots of things that 'the people' could be persuaded to want, and probably vote for, are undesirable or impossible. The job if Parliament is surely to make decisions in the interests of the country, now and in the future. Not just pander to a bunch of racists and nostalgics.
-
You moron!
-
You think I'm a moron because I believe Parliament should do its job?
-
I was referring to the broken record you remainers talk about.. that leave voters are racists etc. As to Parliament..if they were doing their job,they’d be carrying out Brexit,not what they want to happen.
-
Sorry, but almost all the ones I know personally were motivated either by a dislike of immigration or a nostalgia for the England of their youth. And Parliament's job is to attend to the best interests of the country.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.