I'm sorry, sod diversity, just simple 'are they the best candidate, irrespective of race, colour gender or anything else - even being ginger...' otherwise diversity - and that means 'minorities' get preferential treatment and that is anti equality by it's vey nature.
-
-
-
Unconscious bias, John. It has a proven impact in workplaces still.
-
Plus it’ll help us see if there are fewer women applying for certain roles, which allows us to unpick what those barriers are. Is it because the role seems inflexible / male orientated / intimidating to enter if you’re not from a certain social background or ethnicity.
-
Hmm, interesting that it's viewed from that side. I simply prefer to see a 'bias' towards the best person. If the job can't be done by a woman due to physical requirements, then thats a barrier, we shouldn't then remove the barrier (as I've seen) which means the job can't be done
-
What jobs can’t women do due to physical requirements?
-
Heavy lifting
-
Utter rubbish. I personally know a two woman business whose day to day job is lugging 30kg bags of feed and bedding. You can’t preclude a whole gender based on an average capacity / capability!
-
No one is doing that. Nothing to stop women doing that job if they are capable of doing it, but most women don’t, so what’s the issue?
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Any way of publishing a measure of their usefulness?
-
And competency?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
How about we just have who we vote for regardless of gender.

-
Would have thought it would be simple as that. Unfortunately agendas are now being pushed.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Identity politics is toxic. We should be promoting on merit. Fairness is equality of opportunity not parity of outcomehttps://quillette.com/2018/05/05/liberalism-classical-egalitarian/ …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The end of voting for people is upon us.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think we should just have their chromosome type: XX or XY. Let’s keep it factual ;)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
and IQ please
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
How about a parliament that is representative of the VIEWS of the public on immigration, crime, and membership of the European Union?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So MERITOCRACY means nothing ? It's simply a matter of fulfilling QUOTAS.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
That would be discriminatory and alienate a huge group of women who have been subjected to FGM and therefore have neither. Perhaps they could become a new gender ? There are certainly enough other genders around.
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.