I didn’t say “equally bad” as it’s clear you didn’t say that. I said “somehow comparable”. They are not comparable examples that you give. It is no way the same to discriminate based on who you are vs how you act. Hence the words in my tweet.
-
-
-
No, their actions vs Sanders were based on WHO she was, ie. Trump’s press secretary.
-
That’s not how she was born. That’s how she acts. She has become press secretary. People do not choose their orientation or colour of skin. You know this.
-
People are born with their skin colour and sexuality, yes of course. But they’re not born with their religion. That’s a choice. Many on the Republican right also believe (wrongly) sexuality is a choice. They already do use this argument against gay people.
-
Yeah I remember the day my mum laid out a dozen holy texts plus something from
@RichardDawkins and said 'pick one'. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Julia, you're wasting your time. These people see words that aren't there. If someone else opens a tin of alphabetti spaghetti, they start arguing with it.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
Very good and spot on

End of conversation
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
Just for clarity, is discrimination only discrimination when it suits?
- 1 more reply
-
-
-
Discrimination is discrimination. The hard of understanding aka “The snowflake generation” know this, they just choose to try and make a divisive point.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Julia was just asking for a friend.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You’re absolutely correct. These liberals cause more problems than they think they solve.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You’ve fallen into the YOU POST IT YOU OWN IT trap. You’ve openly handed a gift to your critics, it’s unfortunate but if you didn’t mean it that way, it’s too late now. That’s just hard luck.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's amazing that some people do not comprehend simple english!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I wouldn't argue with somebody who thinks children in detention centers (he wasn't bothered about it when
#Obama did it for 8 years) should be let through with criminals to be sold as sex/Work slaves..@JimMFeltonpic.twitter.com/RGXOtZygisThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why would you want to claim other people would make an assertion you wouldn't make, if not because you actually want to promote the assertion without, cravenly, bearing any of the negative effects of associating yourself with such an assertion?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.