When he makes such ridiculous statements, it makes me wonder how much I can trust of what he wrote in his books, several of which I own. If he is so cavalier with the truth now, would he not have bent the truth to suit his theories when writing his books?
-
-
-
He’s a scientist.
-
He actually looks for evidence and analyses it. Surprisingly he doesn't hold with people whose views are based on xenophobia or faded imperialism. And you?
-
You're a clown, trying to ascribe beliefs to me that would suit your agenda. You know nothing about the honest, hard working majority of our people who want Brexit. You would betray your country.
-
You are betraying the UK by supporting
#Brexit. Name one benefit it will bring. And don't say sovereignty / ability to make our laws. When challenged to name one law he would change, David Davis said he couldn't, but it was the principle. Name one promise they have delivered on. -
Sounds a lot like TRUMPISM
-
You have no idea. The hash tag I like is
#ReasonNotTreason, but it seems to have little effect. You have your own problems in the USA as well. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Sadly I think A C Grayling has rubbed off on him.
-
What they do in private is their own affair

- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Shocked to discover Richard Dawkins thinks himself superior to anyone who subscribes to an opposing view to his own!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
He doesn't get out much.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
He also intimated that those who voted
#Leave were not decent people? Very nice.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Bigot - ‘a person who is intolerant to those holding differing opinions ‘. Ring any bells
@RichardDawkins - 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Just shows how the likes of him live in another world. To put things in perspective, 2.2m Londoners voted Leave yet even bussing Remoaniacs in from the Home Counties they could only muster 100000 people. What we saw yesterday was the lunatic fringe of Remain.
-
Go on, I'll ask. Are you saying it was more than 100,000? Will we just call it, a round 4 billion to save any confusion? Can I ask you. When we voted to join 'Common Mkt' in 1975, why 2-3 years later didn't we have a 'Peoples Vote', to double check if people still wanted it?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.