#TermLimits would solve this issue...
Over the 206-year history of this committee, staff have never questioned witnesses in an oversight hearing. Never. Not once. So, to say Chairman Nadler’s demands are unprecedented would be an understatement.pic.twitter.com/CCWKGr3QOM
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They are frightened of AGBarr we have a man that follows and enforces the law. The man clearly stated he will not be bullied by anyone including
@POTUS. So what makes@RepJerryNadler think he can bully people for political reasons. We the people see the FAILING DEMOCRATS. -
The GOP did the same thing when they questioned Ms. Ford.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
But it was OK for the GOP to hire counsel to question Christine Blasey Ford. Right. Got it.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thank you for your words today!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Modern problems require modern solutions.
#nextquestionThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
In the land of short memories: As Barr skips House hearing due to use of staff attorneys to ask questions, remember Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee brought in an outside attorney to question Christine Blasey Ford during Brett Kavanaugh confirmation.
-
Outside, not staff. Witness, not Senate confirmed Cabinet member.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It was probably not necessary in the PAST. But, it is necessary NOW. What is AG Barr is scared of? He is the TOP attorney in the land - he should not be scared unless he is not intending to tell the TRUTH.
#BarrCoverUppic.twitter.com/i2QQ11m4g0
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.