How long do people have to go with no evidence of collusion before they accept there was no collusion?
-
-
-
Tweet unavailable
-
He said further investigation into what the Russians did. There is no evidence of collusion by Trump. Stop pretending there is.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
But not Trump. There is no doubt Russia tried to interfere, but there is NO evidence Trump took part. Get over it.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
You're pathetic. And blocked.
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
This is mumble jumble with Brennan
@CIA Americans KNOW this is all BULLSHIT#SethRichCoverUp -
Brennan is Deep State. Corrupt. Bad. He was also in on Obama Admin. Surveillance of Trump+ Co and everyone else! He's trying to save himself
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE? Russia did not influence the voters!!!!!
-
Damn right. It was an election with people choosing there candidate. Russians had nothing to do with that. All these phony investigation
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Exactly! Thats because this is NO proof that there's a Trump/Russia collusion. Brennan is a hack! Smfh

- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
If Both campaigns were notified of Russia trying to interfere by computer why did HRC campaign and DNC refuse to turn over comps?
-
If looking for "collusion" with respect to Russians didn't a large deposit of money in Clinton's Foundation ring any bells???
-
Last i checked it' s not illegal to talk to Russians, call Russians, go to a dinner in Russia.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I agree with you. Keeps dancing around the real truth. Sounds like a democrat
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.