Lol imagine you seek this discussion out, get absolutely rolled in the conversation, and then STILL put it in your movie. 🤡
Conversation
This Tweet is from a suspended account. Learn more
This Tweet is from a suspended account. Learn more
Show replies
Replying to
I'm sorry but where exactly did Matt 'get rolled' here? He's correctly pointing out the circulator logic in how the Professor defines a woman and was never able to establish a definition.
This is not the win people want to think that it is. It's embarrassing.
169
42
2,655
This Tweet is from an account that no longer exists. Learn more
Show replies
Replying to
Imagine calling yourself an intellectual, spending 5 years making a documentary, then putting in an editing joke stating that a professors thoughts on social constructs is too long and boring.
50
55
4,601
Or... OR... it was a means to advertise to the viewers what the viewers already assume; That you're about to get 10 minutes-worth of 'word salad' disguised as an answer.
91
5
662
Show replies
Replying to
The stated thesis is that he will not get an answer to "What is a woman?". The answers he receives here are a combination of academic word salad, "I don't know why you're asking this" and an objection to the use of the word "truth". What do you believe "getting rolled" is?
16
2
111
The professor correctly points out that Walsh is seeking an essentialist definition of what a woman is. Then went on to define a woman as anyone who identifies as a woman. That's a straight forward answer, but Walsh is not willing to accept that because it's not what he wants.
37
18
995
Replying to
Walsh is looking for a simple answer to what is a more complex question than he wants to admit to. And he's kind of being a jerk here. The professor rightly questions his motives, and Walsh really isn't there to learn anything, just to play 'gotcha'. As is the whole film
59
23
1,630
The idea of transcending gender calls into question their societal beliefs.
22
3
877
Show replies