Judd LegumOvjeren akaunt

@JuddLegum

I write Popular Information, a newsletter about politics and power. Send tips: DMs open | judd@popular.info | jlegum@protonmail.com

Washington, DC
Vrijeme pridruživanja: srpanj 2008.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @JuddLegum

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @JuddLegum

  1. Prikvačeni tweet

    Hi Twitter: I'm launching a new political newsletter called Popular Information. It's for people who give a damn. It would be awesome if you would try it out and let me know what you think. You can sign up at . Thanks! -- Judd

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  2. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Alexa, tell me something shameful about your corporate overlords.

    Poništi
  3. How many retweets would this need to compel to explain himself? Bezos spends extravagantly on branding and marketing. If it becomes a big enough problem, he'll talk.

    Poništi
  4. 4. Why do these companies claim to be environmental champions and then donate thousands to Congress' worst climate denier? Because they think no one is paying attention. Stay informed by subscribing to my newsletter, Popular Information. Sign up ➡️

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  5. 3. says the world is confronting "an urgent carbon problem" that requires "innovative public policy." Last year, Microsoft donated $2500 to Inhofe, who wrote a book claiming climate change is a hoax

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  6. 2. Amazon is not alone in publicly acknowledging the urgency of climate change while quietly contributing thousands to help Inhofe stay in power. says climate change requires "urgent action." Google sent Inhofe an 8K check on December 31

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  7. 1. says climate change is a "dire" problem and he wants to be a "role model" But Amazon has donated $8500 to the 2020 reelection campaign of Senator Jim Inhofe, the most powerful and outspoken climate denier in Congress

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  8. Can’t believe the Deep State put Kansas City in MISSOURI just to embarrass Trump.

    Poništi
  9. Interesting that this ad makes it seem like Johnson was released because of criminal justice reform but it had nothing to do with that. Trump granted her clemency after being lobbied by Kim Kardashian.

    Poništi
  10. There are lots of loud protests when anyone links Fox, the broadcast channel to Fox News; and when anyone conflates the "news side" of Fox News with its "opinion hosts" But Fox is broadcasting the Super Bowl and selected Sean Hannity to interview the president

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  11. Trump claims Bloomberg is demanding a "box" to stand on in the next debate Despite the DNC rule change, Bloomberg hasn't even qualified yet for the next debate, so Trump is just making this up Now this lie will be broadcast, without fact-checking, to millions

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  12. 1. velj

    "The Department of Justice revealed in a court filing late Friday that it has two dozen emails related to the President Donald Trump's involvement in the withholding of millions in security assistance to Ukraine"

    Poništi
  13. 1. velj

    The DNC dramatically changed the debate rules in the middle of the primary in a way the only benefits one person, Mike Bloomberg, who also happens to have become a major donor to the Democratic Party. It’s gross.

    Poništi
  14. 31. sij

    I believe what happened was in appropriate and wrong and, in response, I will do nothing and help cover it up. Thank you for your time. P.S. I am a very serious person.

    Poništi
  15. 31. sij

    Another stunningly illogical rationale. Murkowski says there is not going to be a fair trial in the Senate and therefore will vote against witnesses. Generally, witnesses are a key element of a fair trial.

    Poništi
  16. 31. sij

    3. Perhaps the dumbest argument is that Rubio won't support impeachment because it is partisan but of course if he (and Alexander, who made a similar argument) supported impeachment it wouldn't be partisan

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  17. 31. sij

    2. You can make Rubio's argument that it's a case that should be decided by voters but he acknowledges here that all the facts are not out. Voters will not be able to subpoena Bolton. The Senate can.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  18. 31. sij

    1. I'd just like to note that this explanation is completely illogical Rubio says even assuming the allegations against Trump are true but won't impeach because the people should decide But how are people supposed to decide since Rubio also opposes subpoenaing witnesses?

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  19. 31. sij

    Rubio argues that he's being super reasonable because in "2014, I rejected calls to pursue impeachment of President Obama" lol

    Poništi
  20. 31. sij

    If only the Senate had some way of questioning Bolton so we could figure out who is telling the truth Bolton may also have documents, including notes at the time of the meeting, that could Bolster his version of events

    Poništi
  21. 31. sij

    Congrats on paying money to run an ad in a state you don't represent that includes objectively false information. You are a real hero.

    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·