Article minimizes events at the border regarding the use of militants against the security fence and IDF soldiers. Article doesn’t mention the IEDs, grenades, firearms and a whole host of other methods employed by militant groups.https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1079429426662830081 …
-
-
By your own logic, the two civilians in Hamas custody are also military men since they both served in the IDF.
-
And by your "logic", the two civilians in Hamas custody are throwing IEDs and grenades at their prison captors and launching arson balloons from their cells (which, if true, would make any severe action taken against them by their captors understandable)
-
See how this works?
-
That "unarmed" excuse is utter balderdash.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
...and whats your actual point? That it is fine to wound and or kill them even if they're unarmed? Your narrative implies they were armed with these guns at the protest yet they weren't.
Thanks. Twitter will use this info to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Any pictures of protestors actually armed AT THE PROTESTS? Any pictures of the murdered medics, children, journalist, WITH WEAPONS?
Thanks. Twitter will use this info to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It doesnt matter if they are militants. If they are unarmed, they should be treated like civilians.
Thanks. Twitter will use this info to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
https://twitter.com/Israellycool/status/1079400287201386499?s=19 … *there is a video in which she throws dangerous material in the direction of the fence! more important! * Who is the idiot who sends girls where there are clouds of smoke and burning tires? * Molotov cocktails, grenades, explosive pipes are thrown?
Thanks. Twitter will use this info to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.