understandable that you didn't LIKE how Simone White wrote about your book but garbled and nonsensical suggests you didnt get it
Whenthe NYTBR publishers a garbled nonsensical review of your book about the pleasures and rewards of poetry in a special issue on poetry
-
-
-
I got it alright
-
okay but then garbled & nonsensical are inaccurate. You didn't like her thinking.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It was really bad, strangely bad.
@matthewzapruder -
I did not agree with what that review said about Jill's book at all.
-
why all the subtweeting here? pretty sure the review's author is on this website. speak up.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I don't read the NYTBR & uninformed, cavalier reviews are the reason why. It has no authority for me. I can't wait to read your book. Jill!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It seemed to be not very related to your actual book, more like an opportunity to put forth reviewer's opinions.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ok my tweet in agreement was too mean but this review was off the wall
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It was a bizarre review. I'm EXTREMELY excited to read it!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I meant the review! Not the book
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Is not Mr zapruder by this definition a white poet of power? Why attack one and not the other?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Things are wonky over in NYTBR land
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.