The bottom line is very simple: the Russian intelligence services aren't using Wikileaks as a conduit for benign purposes.
-
-
-
They have the ability, and every incentive, to mix doctored items in with benign ones, to advance their true interests...
-
... namely, disrupting the U.S. election, and increasing the chances of getting a Putin puppet into the White House.
-
If other people doctor the leaks that is not
@WikiLeaks' fault. They have a clean 10 year track record: Bush war crimes, NSA etc - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@Khanoisseur@DerekStang@PastorDScott@USABrit4Trump Why is so much credibility given to Wikileaks? -
10 years no mistakes? Unlike MSM's daily mistakes?
-
Wikileaks is a Russian front-their dumps have *always* contained fakes
@Sandric1982@davettelurae@JoyAnnReid@MalcolmNance@PastorDScottpic.twitter.com/x13HDWmtwP
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Wikileaks has admitted to publishing fake content-these can bring about "political reform"
@quikjl_@Sandric1982@davettelurae@PastorDScottpic.twitter.com/6ox4Yk732b
-
This same piece also uses sources saying
@wikileaks is CIA Front Group........ -
yep, theory early on was Wikileaks was CIA front, then Cablegate and Snowden happened
@Sandric1982@quikjl_@davettelurae@PastorDScott -
Just saying articles making suspicious claims isn't evidence/proof esp. w/out sourcing
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
.
@JoyAnnReid@MalcolmNance And media is normalizing email hacking as OK way 2 get "info" -- what r implications there? Not being discussed. -
It was good when he was leaking Bush's war crimes. Journalists aren't doing their jobs


WikiLeaks
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@Khanoisseur@DerekStang@PastorDScott@USABrit4Trump the most damaging stuff so far is podesta's risotto recipe -
Yep cuz law breaking & corruption is normalized
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@MalcomNance PLEASE tell the rest of your
@MSNBC colleagues who report endlessly on the bogus Wikileaks info. -
Maybe find an email that is actually bogus so this claim holds water? So far any addressed have been confirmed
-
Heh! Jill Stein? Try harder.
-
Well when you have a racist buffoon and a corrupt plutocrat, yes I chose the Green party. Holds my values.
-
But I did like how you dismissed me without actually addressing the issue. I expect that out of HRC supporters.
-
Stein is a racist fraud who's close to Putin. No need to engage further.
-
Racist fraud? You mean like ALL the shit the Clintons have said over the years. Like I said
#Shade from shills -
Jill is irrelevant. And never will be. If Trump weren't running she'd be the most unqualified ever.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.