@GalvinAlmanza I will tell you that under Lacey and others in L.A., that was the ONLY criteria. I had a mentor who told me that I needed 50 trials to promote in one year. Only had 18. There was no way I could get there ethically. But some people did it. And they got promoted.
-
-
-
It was all about FELONY jury trial stats. One female DA I worked with had none. She was up for promotion in a couple of months. She find out I had 18. She hiked up offers to force trials. Got to 20 in three months (which is insane). Got promoted. STOPPED doing trials after that.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I worked in a prosecutor’s office that used to evaluate assistant prosecutors on conviction rates — when my boss (the elected official) and I reviewed the data subjectively, we found that the worst and least respected assistant prosecutors had the *highest* conviction rates
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Use Chicago and evaluate D.A. for us with your criteria.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
AMEN
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.