I will spare everyone the pain and disgust of clicking on your page and link. You are a misogynist and thrive on lies. https://twitter.com/sithy321/status/979228156157546496 …
-
-
You are mansplaining anatomy and surgery to an OB/GYN surgeon. Do not do that. And, no, Dr. Gunter is not obligated to give you any attention.
-
Oh really now. And what is it called when a woman “mansplains” to a man about male genitals? I’m sorry, but an ob/gyn has absolutely no business dictating to men about their genitals.
-
Oh how glorious would it be, if women made laws and you could say this ALL DAY LONG, but women “know what’s best for you fragile little men” - and laws kept passing where WOMEN decide what’s best for MEN’S bodies!
-
Oh oh glorious it would be if boys and men had the same protection under the law against forced genital cutting as women, and
#muhreligion abc#muhcustoms were no exception. Isn’t#femaleprivilege grand? Not so fresh as we think we are, are we.#i2 -
Tweet unavailable
-
In case you actually wanted to know, circumcision can & does result in the partial/full ablation of the penis. Some men can’t have sex at all. What do you know about what it does? Do you have a penis? Are you circ’d? Didn’t think so. Stop
#womansplaining to me. Knownothing.#i2 -
I detest when women tell me that circumcision is not a big deal. I always ask them if they would be OK if their genitals were cut off as children without them consenting to it. They say it is not the same. They show how ignorant they are...
-
Justifying male infant genital mutilation “because it’s different than FGM” is like saying it’s OK to cut off the left ring finger in boys because it’s not the right index finger in girls. They are different. They are used differently. The principle is the same.
#i2
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Yes, any comments made here by Dr. Jen can't be seen by me b/c she previously blocked me for daring to question her hypocritical support of non therapeutic infant circumcision. A clear indication of her inability to defend the practice, which is embraced by most US OB_GYN$$.
#i2 -
As a Dr, she has a duty to medical facts and to respond with such when asked. Reaping profit from performing non-medical surgery on healthy, non-consenting individuals constitutes medical fraud. In children, abuse. She’s either a Dr. or a snake oil salesman. Which is it?
#i2 -
Doctors have no duty to respond to dipshit on Twitter
-
Doctors have a duty to dispense factual and accurate information. Blocking and running shows they can’t. What will it be?
#i2 -
Hahaha tell that to abortion providers in red states and their legislatures that force them to lie to their patients.
-
Outside of the intactivist scope... but you’re more than welcome to try...
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Through the miracle of twitter Block Chain I can block idiot boy and every one of his followers with one click. Yay technology!
-
Share your knowledge, oh mighty one, so that others may benefit from this! (ie Ooh, I didn't know that existed. Thank you for enlightenment
) -
Drs. Should strive to know MORE, not less. If all a doctor can do is wave people away or block people on twitter when confronted with real verifiable knowledge, it's a problem. It's not "cute," it's not "clever." It's cowardice.
#i2
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
It all sucks!