#HealthcareAndSecularism James Chedwiggen: the law may have a role in protecting children's rights and ending circumcision, but it won't work without cultural change.
Worth noting that 62% in UK would support a ban on circumcisionhttps://www.secularism.org.uk/news/2018/02/nss-says-uk-should-follow-icelands-lead-to-end-genital-cutting …
-
-
What’s more, you need to examine your argument because it shoots women in the pussy; are you actually saying you’d advocate for
#FGM that is comparable to male#circumcision? How much flesh would you be OK with removing in a girl? Why is there an “acceptable” level for boys?#i2pic.twitter.com/Iu0WHSxh6f
-
Would you be ready to undergo
#circumcision and submit your daughters to it if some dr furnished “studies” saying it were “beneficial?” What would you tell the dr who offered to do this for you? This would speak volumes.#i2 http://blog.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk/2017/08/does-female-genital-mutilation-have-health-benefits-the-problem-with-medicalizing-morality/ … -
No, I would rationally educate myself like my parents did/were and from their own personal experience/knowledge ;-)~
-
Don’t deny the science now... are you denying science? Science denier?
#i2 -
Not at all but, I'd suggest that you ignore common sense & the opinions of those who have 1st hand knowledge of this topic ;-)LOL Bye, foolish ignoramus ! LOL
-
The consensus among the most respected medical organizations is that male infant circumcision is unnecessary. Really? 1st hand knowledge? Are you a circumcised woman after all?
#i2 -
Nothing but, moronic, nonsensical/irrational, ignorant comment from a fool. Def. of a fool: someone who ignores reality ;-) Take care ! Bye, fool, LOL
-
Right. Are you done yet?
- 8 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
