Joseph Lewis

@Joseph4GI

Intactivist, human rights advocate

Stockton, CA
Vrijeme pridruživanja: kolovoz 2015.

Medijski sadržaj

  1. 18. sij

    The in 2012 “The benefits [of male infant ] outweigh the risks” BUT “[they’re] not great enough to recommend [it].” Also the AAP: “The true incidence of complications after newborn circumcision is unknown.” Is counting? Because *we* are.

  2. 17. sij
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    Debating male infant is like debating slavery and rape. There simply isn’t a debate. America is the one English-speaking country that hasn’t abandoned it as a routine practice. Fortunately, it’s going out of style. US moms need to get with the program.

  3. 17. sij

    Nice infographic to tweet for information resources on the truth about . Share where appropriate.

  4. 17. sij
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    It may be too late for you, but others interested in educating themselves on this subject, please do your research. Knowledge is power. Knowledgeable parents don’t let this happen to their children.

  5. 17. sij
    Odgovor korisnicima

    People who don’t want their business being talked about should keep it off Twitter.

  6. 17. sij
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    If you don’t want people “attacking” your idiotic parenting, don’t post it on social media where that’s bound to happen. Male infant circumcision is child abuse and genital mutilation. Wise parents refuse this for their children.

  7. 16. sij
    Odgovor korisnicima i sljedećem broju korisnika:

    If you believe those who do not hold your political views should lose their bank accounts, you sir, are an authoritarian.

  8. 16. sij
    Odgovor korisnicima

    Let me assure you, it’s not Bernie supporters “turning voters away from the process.” Look in the mirror.

  9. 16. sij
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    Anyone not rooting for your candidate is a bigot of some sort, right. We get it. Because this worked so well in 2016, right? Good luck beating Drumpf with a loser candidate...

  10. 16. sij
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    Anyone not rooting for your candidate is a bigot of some sort, right. We get it. Because this worked so well in 2016, right? Good luck beating Drumpf with a loser candidate...

  11. 14. sij
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    Can’t ban people from a country you have arms deals with...

  12. 13. sij
    Odgovor korisnicima

    I like how Drumpf supporters suddenly “care” about terrorists... you didn’t care about terrorists when your president shook hands with and made arms deals with them... 🧐

  13. 13. sij
    Odgovor korisniku/ci
  14. 13. sij
    Odgovor korisnicima

    Actually, no he wouldn’t. Drumpf quakes in his boots and would rather not have to face him. That’s why he poopoos him now. His day is coming though...

  15. 13. sij
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    It’s nonsense to “unify” under a losing candidate. Instead of asking “Who is more of a uniter?,” Democrats need to ask “Who has better chances?” Let’s recall 2016; Clinton mopped the floor with Drumpf in the debates. Did it help? Choose wisely or 2016 will repeat itself.

  16. 11. sij
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    “Oh whoever could our leader be...”

  17. 11. sij
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    “Oh whoever could our leader be...”

  18. 11. sij
  19. 11. sij

    The in 2012 “The benefits [of male infant ] outweigh the risks” BUT “[they’re] not great enough to recommend [it].” Also the AAP: “The true incidence of complications after newborn circumcision is unknown.” Is counting?

  20. 10. sij
    Odgovor korisnicima

    The facts: was always religious. 1st practiced by Egyptians, it was mostly a practice of Jews and Muslims. Most men were never circumcised. 70% of men are intact globally. Circumcision today began as to stop boys and men from masturbating.

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·