Yes. The announcement had the feel of an indictment for murder. Can this draconian intervention be in the interest of stockholders, or anyone?https://twitter.com/sapinker/status/1046054257626161152 …
-
-
Replying to @DavidDeutschOxf
David, Elon has blatantly manipulated the stock price for years, with misleading coordinated information drops to raise the price. I’m a trader and an Elon fan. There is no denying he illegally has been boosting the price. It affects short sellers, and hurts the competition.
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
-
Replying to @DavidDeutschOxf
Ask yourself this, if it were Jamie Dimon, how would the public react? “Trial by public opinion” is surely wrong.
$Tsla should have accepted the settlement offered by the SEC. (unless a condition of which was Elon’s removal, but we don’t know what the terms were).1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JordanTSack @DavidDeutschOxf
Exactly, we don't know the terms so how can you then say "they should've accepted the settlement". That's bizarre.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TomJohn86308147 @DavidDeutschOxf
They said they changed their mind at the last minute to not accept the settlement. I doubt they would have even entertained settling if that was a condition. What should they do? Honestly, he should be banned from being an executive of a public co. (As much as it hurts to say).
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JordanTSack @DavidDeutschOxf
Yes but why did you say they should've accepted with no information on the conditions? There is of course a reason for turning it down. He one of the best CEO's I've ever seen so I think he should continue. Especially if there is a chance of burning more hedge funds.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Jordan Sack Retweeted zerohedge
Jordan Sack added,
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.