I rarely talk Trump. I never know when he’s actually crazy or crazy like a fox. I’ve called him an existential risk. I thought that was clear enough. He’s an existential risk who, ex-post, might do some good, but at unacceptably high ex-ante risk. I can’t believe we’re here.https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1021234525626609666 …
-
-
Replying to @EricRWeinstein @SamHarrisOrg
That's right. But the status quo ante was also an existential risk, and for some of the same reasons.
8 replies 4 retweets 73 likes -
Replying to @DavidDeutschOxf @SamHarrisOrg
Yes. Exactly. It was likely a slower version of existential risk by inaction. The thing that disturbs me most is that neither Trump version nor the more sober Clinton/Bush/Obama type strategy are likely to be anywhere near the efficient frontier of possible approaches.
10 replies 2 retweets 43 likes -
Eric/David/Sam, what are your thoughts on using
$btc as the engine to achieve the game theory necessary to transition into the “efficient frontier of possible approaches”?2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @JordanTSack @EricRWeinstein and
You mean by relieving the central banks of the ability to print money, and thereby reduce the ability of the gvt to leverage everyone's assets without their consent to fund, among other things, endless war?
3 replies 0 retweets 10 likes
I mean that the current system does not allow for allocation of resources on the production possibilities frontier, with respect to balance of long term goals/threats.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.