Updated Heuristics
1. Academics and salesman that advocate Trans-GMOs have never owned a farm.
2. Farmers that grow Trans-GMOs have never directly sold to the end customer of their crop. (and rarely eat the crops they grow).
@trevorcharles @thefarmbabe @MGigger @JodiKoberinski
-
-
So we shouldn’t do anything because an evil scientist could *maybe* do something bad?
A change of 1-2 nucleotides is much more predictable than even “traditional breeding” -
There is not an evil scientist, there is a bunch of naive idiots playing with biology. And it is very unpredictable taking trans nucleotides and entering them into a DNA strand they did not come from. My bull could copulate my tomato plant forever and nothing would happen.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Do you fear the “extreme risk of creating organisms with DNA that have never existed together...”. with hybrids? We’re not talking about the precise addition of one or two genes like with GM. It involves the random combination of 1000’s of genes from two different organisms.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
[citation needed]
-
Crichton, 1990.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
OMG. We just found the guy who learned everything he knows about genetic modification from a movie about dinosaurs. Somebody call Chris Pratt, he needs to come inspect my canola.
-
Chris Pratt could check my Canola any day.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This is the dumbest premise ever. If dinosaurs existed and humans didn't, how exactly do we have humans now without DNA that never existed on earth before? Also, I am quite happy that my DNA is unique, because they means I am very different from you.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I’m honestly not sure what to think about this guy.
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.