Jordan. I think TYT has a responsibility to be impartial and it almost seems like Cenk wants to protect his investment in the DNC structure.
-
-
-
Just a responsibility to reporting facts in a way that is readily absorbed. To draw no conclusions in face of blatant corruption not helpful
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
the other dude was speculating that Beck is just an "opportunistic lawyer," tho. Makes sense people would be peeved by that
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
In this case,no one is actually wrong.But I have to say,that segment is very weak and people expect better from TYT, that's why the backlash
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That's not what was being discussed. They could have done the back room if they wanted but not whilst pretending to be democratic.
-
If they chose to do the back room they would just pick their candidate and forego the primary. That is what john and mike were saying.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I interpreted as "it's messed up & wrong but they don't have a case..." Michael Sure was the one defending DNC lawyers
-
It didn't feel right that's 4 sure. Def not surprising coming from HRC & DNC apologist Micheal Sure.John was closer 2 "the right side" lol
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You would be correct. I stopped listening after the election but I still watch highlights every so often and I don't like what I'm hearing.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Luckily that's not how the judge perceived this issue - 4 the time being at least.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.