@mattyglesias what is the point to any of this pointless "election"? It's all just to APPEAR like democracy.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Used to be a time when publications cared that they hired pure unadulterated hacks. Not Anymore.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Are you similarly "concerned" about Lewandowski working for CNN while on trump's payroll?
-
Or do you need WikiLeaks to tell you what to write about?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Who? And don't cite WikiLeaks as your source, they don't even pretend to be objective.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
.
@JordanChariton@Greenow_@HillaryClinton lobbyist-ism is baaaad, m'kay???Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sorry, "ties to" is not the same as "employed by" or "paid by" by any stretch of your paranoid imagination. Nice try.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks for proving you're only "concerned" about tenuous ties to Dems, but completely ignore direct connection w/ trump & GOP.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That's false equivalency. Being employed by is a far greater conflict of interest than "ties to" via former consulting gigs.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
By "butt in" I mean you answered a question I asked him. If U don't agree w/ his one-sided "concern" Y did U defend and answer?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.