3 years ago, when a domestic abuser blogging for @HuffPost FALSELY accused me of sexual assault—w/ no editorial oversight—my life/career was upended.
Yet, HuffPost was legally shielded by Sec. 230 bc it was a blogger—not a staff employee. THREAD...https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1313511340124917760?s=20 …
-
-
Outlets like
@HuffPo have a responsibility to VET what's published on THEIR platform-whether on their front page or on their blog. Why? Because to the public, if it's printed under HuffPo, it's a reputable news story...even if the author is an unvetted domestic abuser -
I'm not unaware of something like this. It happens in traditional media. They can print, air, digitize anything about a guy under age 18 without vetting or contacting for comment. Another lawyer used to tell me media can say whatever they want. No criminal eligibility necessary
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.