3 years ago, when a domestic abuser blogging for @HuffPost FALSELY accused me of sexual assault—w/ no editorial oversight—my life/career was upended.
Yet, HuffPost was legally shielded by Sec. 230 bc it was a blogger—not a staff employee. THREAD...https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1313511340124917760?s=20 …
-
-
Does it need to be revised? HuffPo is an edited site. YouTube, Twitter and Facebook are taking down legally protected speech, which clearly indicates they're editing the content. Section 230 is meant to protect sites like Blogger, Craigslist, that do not edit legal content
-
That idea has no basis in law.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.