I am skeptical of national match up polls this early in the race, even if the Dem has a major lead. Technically the top 4 Dems can beat Trump head to head. I don't think anyone should (or does) believe thathttps://twitter.com/JordanChariton/status/1230553551342120960 …
-
-
Replying to @DrJasonJohnson
Are you skeptical of head to head polls with
@BernieSanders leading him in MI/WI/PA from@nytimes. You don’t think Sanders gets those 77,000 votes Hillary Clinton didn’t—particularly with more young voters coming out?https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nytimes.com/2019/11/04/upshot/trump-biden-warren-polls.amp.html …4 replies 2 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @JordanChariton
We're 8 months out. Those polls are in a vacuum. You're assuming high youth turnout and I expect voter suppression. I'm inherently skeptical of campaigns where success requires alot of new variables
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @DrJasonJohnson
Fair enough—but I don’t see why you’re not in turn skeptical about going back to the same exact well. Anyone with eyes can see Biden would lose to Trump (actually has worse liabilities than Clinton—MI/WI/PA 2016 exit polls showed trade was top issue). Once Trumps labels..
2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @JordanChariton @DrJasonJohnson
Him TPP Joe, it will be over for him. Bloomberg would hemmorage WAY MORE youth/minority supporters than Clinton did. Pete/Amy/Warren have little support or excitement among minorities.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Just seems like folks like you are more willing to roll the dice on bigger risks than on @BernieSanders bc of a bias against him rather than data and changing political trends
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.