Even while working w/ in rules back then—he spoke out loudly against superdelegares and their influence (and against media lumping them in w/ pledged delegates). He & progressives then fought hard to reduce influence of superdelegates so that the candidate w/ the most pledged...
-
-
Show this thread
-
Delegates wins. I am not seeing the hypocrisy—he worked within the rules they were in 2016 while loudly pushing for them to be changed.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It’s cuz they got nothing else. You saw it at the debates. They can’t beat him on policy
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
As usual, they are slinging mud and hoping some sticks.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Accuse the accuser is a well known tactic, used by politicians and security agencies alike.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Like almost all of their arguments, it’s disingenuous and sometimes just outright lies.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And the media reported those super delegates as facts in the delegate count over and over. We then found out H was giving $ to state parties in favor of their super d votes like Bloomberg is doing now
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But they were always working under the premise of getting in to the convention with a majority -not the- of PLEDGED delegates. And based on that convincing superdelegates to support them.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
DNC...Do as I say, not as I do.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.