What’s truly stunning is how many highly paid/renowned political journalists report easily disproven/counter-factual things 24/7 and get REWARDED with circular RT praise and then cable news picking up their fact-free narratives. Let’s go through the list...
-
-
5) Notion that
@BernieSanders would be a loser in general bc independents, moderates and Republicans doesn’t align with data and facts. Sanders has always done well in rural and more conservative areas in Vermont. He won rural/conservative areas in 2016 as well. He also won...Show this thread -
Several RED/PURPLE states or almost won. WON: Oklahoma, Indiana, Kansas, Colorado, Nebraska, Idaho, Utah, Wyoming, West Virginia, Montana, North Dakota. Lost by a point (or less than a point): Iowa, Missouri, Kentucky
Show this thread -
6) Compared to Obama 2012
@HillaryClinton had -5% less black voters come out -5% less Latino voters fome out -6% less age 18-29 voters come out@BernieSanders is in strong lead win 18-29, leading among Latinos, and doing the best among black voters under 40.Show this thread -
7)
@BernieSanders’ STRONGEST demographic are those making 50k or less and with just high school degrees. THAT IS TRUMP’s base. 8) Trump was just caught on tape saying he feared Clinton picking Bernie as VP in 2016 bc he is strong on trade...the issue that helped Trump beat herShow this thread -
I can go all the way up to 50-100 reasons but I gotta do some work. Moral of the story...political journalists KNOW ALL OF THIS. They choose to ignore it or distort the facts...
Show this thread -
This is why so many people think we can only have incremental change, i.e: cake for the elites, crumbs for you and I!
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.