"I've criticized Tulsi hard on numerous occasions. This was not the one you'd pick" Quoted that for you again, just so you realize what a swing and miss you've got here. You are party over people, Jordan. I am people over party. That's our difference.
-
-
Replying to @DerekJShaffer @coryascott and
No-the difference is I actually am an objective person who looks at all things case by case. Trump clearly tried to bribe a foreign leader and I agree with him deserving to be impeached for that. Why folks can’t both 1) continue calling out corp Dems and MIC 2) admit when
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JordanChariton @DerekJShaffer and
The president is doing clearly impeachable things...is beyond me. The folks who argue it throw out a bunch of totally unrelated bullshit about how “partisan” the process is and how corrupt Dems are too. Yes, both of those things are true! But guess what else is...Trump tried to
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JordanChariton @DerekJShaffer and
Extort a foreign leader to investigate his political opponent. I say that as someone who barely covers Trump and has disdain for the 24/7 Trump media obsession. It’s not “bravery” to ignore a president abusing power and try and hold yourself up to the “center” (which
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JordanChariton @DerekJShaffer and
You have no iron-clad proof, only a reasonable suspicion - not enough to impeach. On the other hand you have the leader of the house who has been harboring and protecting war criminals. Surely an impeachable offense and a slam dunk, no?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Aprescoup101 @DerekJShaffer and
Yea, White House ordering the Pentagon to freeze all aid to Ukraine 90 minutes after Trump asked the Ukranian leader to investigate Joe Biden...that’s just a coincidence! This level of stupidity and willful ignorance is usually what I see from Fox viewershttps://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nytimes.com/2019/12/21/us/politics/white-house-pentagon-ukraine-aid.amp.html …
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @JordanChariton @DerekJShaffer and
Exactly. Suspicious but not proof of an impeachable offense, esp in view of denial of pressure from the new Ukrainian President. Though there are plenty legitimate and slam dunk offenses which Congress, if it didn't have dirty hands itself, could have used to impeach him with.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @Aprescoup101 @DerekJShaffer and
Respectfully, you’re blind if you find this simply “suspicious.” It’s literally the president on tape improperly asking foreign leader to open investigation into political opponent (one I dislike) and than his White House immediately freezing aid to that country in order to
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @JordanChariton @Aprescoup101 and
Force the Ukranian leader to do so. Why I feel strongly about this is how bad-faith people like you are. IF IT WERE PRESIDENT Hillary Clinton in same exact scenario, you’d rightly be up in arms calling for impeachment. But when it’s Trump, there’s all this hemming and hawing.
4 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @JordanChariton @Aprescoup101 and
I think there is FAR WORSE Trump has done that were grounds to be impeached. I also think there’s PLENTY to not only remove Pelosi and other Dems from office but charge them with crimes. But that doesn’t mean I just close my eyes and pretend what Trump did was harmless
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
Doing so is how u enable dictators and kings. Doesn’t mean I won’t call out Dems just as hard as I always do. But 2 + 2=4. I’m not going to ignore reality to get clicks and manipulate rightly angry viewers
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.