Article one in its final version as I sent you very clearly is referring to him withholding the allotted aid from Ukraine for personal gain. He definitely did that and it definitely makes sense to vote yes on that article.
-
-
Replying to @KyleKulinski
Only if you're willing to endorse the Cold War premises and Russiagate fantasies that the *drafters of the impeachment articles* explicitly cited as their rationale for why they drafted the articles the way they did. I'm glad at least one member of Congress saw through this BSpic.twitter.com/9fkqCV5AgN
12 replies 14 retweets 121 likes -
Replying to @mtracey
1-If it's BS vote no, not present (as I would do on art 2) 2-I just told you I'm not accepting the cold war premise but I still vote yes on article 1. No need to tell me how I feel about it 3-Idc about their rationalizations. Art 1 as I sent you is clearly abt Ukraine & he did it
14 replies 9 retweets 144 likes -
Replying to @KyleKulinski @mtracey
4- Reading article 1 on its own divorced from why they say they did it, it's obviously about withholding allotted aid from Ukraine for personal gain, which he clearly did. Stupefied that you can't admit that.
8 replies 8 retweets 118 likes -
Replying to @KyleKulinski @mtracey
Michael has a mental block when it comes to nuanced thinking that processes 2 thoughts simultaneously 1) RussiaGate is bs 2) Trump withheld aid in order to extract political favor. Acknowledging #2 has nothing to do with Russiagate or Dems’ impeachment motives
7 replies 9 retweets 63 likes -
Replying to @JordanChariton @KyleKulinski
You can theoretically separate #2 from #1 but the articles of impeachment explicitly fuse them together, as evidenced by a huge body of evidence, including the text of the actual impeachment articles. So #1 and #2 are inseparable in the context of this impeachment vote.
7 replies 3 retweets 21 likes -
Replying to @mtracey @KyleKulinski
I read both articles. There’s nonsense on Russia in there but Article 1 is pretty clear in describing Trump and Ukraine. Your argument hinges on semantics—a lawmaker shouldn’t vote yes on clear wrongdoing by the president when it comes to Ukraine bc there’s stuff in the articles
5 replies 3 retweets 21 likes -
About Russia. That’s nonsensical. Any politician—Tulsi included—can vote yes on article 1 while voicing there position that Russia has nothing to do with impeachment and Russiagate is propaganda. You seem to, I think unintentionally, be fine to ignore
1 reply 1 retweet 14 likes -
The president dangling foreign aid over another country unless that country announces an investigation on his political opponents. I don’t like Joe Biden, but the fact that it’s him is irrelevant. You shouldn’t be giving Trump a pass on gross misconduct based on semantics
12 replies 2 retweets 17 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Huh? I think George W. Bush should be worse than impeached...he should be in prison. But what does his crimes have to do with whether Trump committed an impeachable offense? That’s some serious changing of the subject
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.