I'm a @TulsiGabbard supporter on many things but a present vote on impeachment is not about finding the center or bridging the divide. Irregardless of the merits of impeaching Trump, this vote is not leadership. You vote yes or nohttps://twitter.com/TulsiGabbard/status/1207753618935308288 …
-
-
and Democratic Party theatrics aside (which is certainly true), Trump clearly tried to dangle foreign aid over a foreign leader to harm a political opponent (an opponent I have no regard for). He did so when he could have just went to his DOJ. You can think Russiagate is bogus..
-
while simultaneously acknowledging Trump abused his office to interfere with that investigation. You can also think Russiagate is bogus while simultaneously having working ears---the Trump/Ukraine call clearly showed an impeachable offense. It's not even a close call.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
What instances did they cite as obstruction? Cause a house subpoena isnt good enuff and asking his lawyer if he can fire the special prosecutor and not doing it is also not good enuff. I want to see the smoking gun that no liberal can cite the past 2 days no matter how much i beg
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Did you read the text of the impeachment article? It says that Trump "betrayed the Nation," and the Judiciary Committee report defined "betray the Nation" as committing treason to help Russia. The article went far beyond saying Trump did something improper with respect to Ukraine
-
Just vote yes cause trump bad is basically what hes saying ignoring the electoral implications and optics of trying to coup the elected president
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The point Mike was trying to make is that they hijacked Ukrainegate yesterday & it was 24/7 Russiagate in the house. I heard the words "Russia" and "Putin" 3 times more than I heard the words "Ukraine" and "Biden".
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's not obstruction for a POTUS to exercise his authorized powers. He didn't materially interfere with any criminal investigation. There was no criminal ongoing or official judicial proceeding during any of the alleged "incidents" cited in the report.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
so, set a guy up and then prosecute on lies, and his lies
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.