The Amazon/Bezos cul-de-sac aside, a lot of the Sanders gripes about media coverage are legitimate points about dumb cable segmentshttps://www.thedailybeast.com/team-bernie-the-press-has-a-personal-bias-against-him-and-find-his-supporters-annoying?ref=author …
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @daveweigel
You can’t put aside the
@amazon@washingtonpost. Anyone with eyes can see that 75% of coverage from your paper (not you) is critical of Sanders...down to the Post managing to find the only person in America (one of your editors) to pen on why they want to pay their student debt1 reply 2 retweets 22 likes -
Replying to @JordanChariton @daveweigel and
Essentially baked into the Post’s cake to instinctually feel progressive proposals (even those polling with majority support) are “radical” or “unelectable.” Bezos calling shots isn’t the issue—it’s the inherent bias of paper’s like the Post. Of the Post you do one of the most
1 reply 2 retweets 16 likes -
-
Yeah, I stay away from the editorial side because it's separate from the news side.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Respectfully—that’s the same framing Fox News uses. IF you are an outlet claiming “neutrality”-opinion doesn’t get a pass if its completely lopsided (almost exclusively anti Sanders) or the opinion isn’t factually supporter (i.e.
@JRubinBlogger@Milbank etc). Not an attack on2 replies 1 retweet 16 likes
You personally but this is why it’s humorous when the Post responds with indignation over criticism by Sanders that anyone who reads the Post regularly can see as clear as day
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.