These are lies by former colleague @JordanChariton, I support universal healthcare and defended Sanders in several recent articles. Here's what I support https://www.mediaite.com/opinion/heres-why-bernie-sanders-medicare-for-all-plan-is-bad-for-kamala-harris/ …https://twitter.com/JordanChariton/status/1153751351911993344 …
-
-
Replying to @tommyxtopher
Tommy--all one has to do is go read your stories from 2016 and your current stories for this campaign on
@BernieSanders. They are overwhelmingly negative and showing a clear bias. It's COMPLETELY FINE to have bias against Sanders if you don't like him for whatever reason. But at2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
least acknowledge it in ur pieces rather than pretending to be operating in good faith. By the way--what you left out of your piece (besides the fact that the same 2 hosts had lied just a week prior about popularity of
#MedicareForAll as well as popularity for Bernie's policies)1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
is the fact that Harlow's comparison to the current Medicare system (i.e. not all doctors participate) is an apples to oranges comparison. What Bernie failed to state was....with all Americans in the M4A system, the doctors Harlow referenced that don't participate now won't
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
have the luxury of choosing not too....all Americans would be enrolled in M4A, meaning doctors don't have a plethora of other options...they either take these patients or they don't have any. Sure, there are doctors that can exclusively serve the wealthy and not participate--but
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
that will be the exception--not the rule. Also apples to oranges to compare what Bernie is saying about patients keeping their doctors to Pres. Obama's false promise---Obamacare is a private-public plan (a conservative 1 at that) which could have never credibly kept that promise
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Lastly--why would
@cnn and you focus on the overwhelming MINORITY of people that might have doctors that don't participate and not the overwhelming MAJORITY of people that would? Seems like outlets intent on focusing on the plight of the for profit system.2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @JordanChariton @tommyxtopher and
If I had time 2moro to go through your Bernie stories from 2016 & this campaign, it would overwhelmingly be negative. Fact that u pretend otherwise is silly. Just own your bias against him and be transparent w/ the audience--just like I'm transparent that I personally support him
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @JordanChariton @tommyxtopher and
and by the way---curious you write about
@Bernie being "exposed" but are crickets when@KamalaHarris does interviews on@cnn making absurd claims that she is going to propose M4A with no tax increases (not possible) or when she flip flops on private insurance (4x at this point)2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
same can be said for @ewarren, who has also said drastically different things about M4A and ending private insurance...but all of this curiously misses your radar.
-
-
Replying to @JordanChariton @BernieSanders and
I criticized Warren in my M4A piece as well. They all sound silly when they claim it doesn't end private health insurance, and it will be costly in the general election. They need to stop saying that shit.https://www.mediaite.com/opinion/heres-why-bernie-sanders-medicare-for-all-plan-is-bad-for-kamala-harris/ …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.