I’m glad to here that but I no longer read NYTimes. The reason is, for every one good piece of journalism there are like 10 pieces of propganda. We have to raise the bar. NYTimes like other media has to make a choice: to be entertainment or to be news. They can not be both.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Except he’s laundering money for... the Russians! Who... tried to influence the election I his favor! You don’t see a connection there?
-
It's always been there! It didn't start with Trump. Dig deeper into
@HillaryClinton et al. That whole narrative was started by Jon Podesta & other Clinton cronies, trying to take the heat off of themselves! They even donated to Trump's campaign.https://medium.com/@kevin_33184/its-time-to-reckon-with-clinton-democrats-who-pushed-russiagate-9ecb67cb60ae …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
They ALL do that... REASON WHY they don't endict him for this.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Can’t it be both
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yep, it always has been. I never thought he was as rich ss he claimed.pic.twitter.com/57CHXfGLEv
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
SO they waited until 2016 not when he was already wealthy to do this outside the spotlight? Doesn’t make sense. Esp knowing he was under a microscope. Wouldn’t the special council find something like he did with others like Cohen and Popodopulous?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.