I genuinely and sincerely don't know the diff between the two, why one is okay and one is prison worthy. The only difference I can see is the source of much of Assange's info is foreign, while NYTimes/WaPo use domestic sources? That doesn't justify it but its the only diff I see
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Only if they speak Truth to Power, which they will not.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You forgot Buzzfeed ! Errr... wait ..
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But if he helped break into our gov to receive that info rather than it be given to him w/o his active involvement of getting that info there could be a problem...?
https://twitter.com/juliadavisnews/status/1116337390338158593?s=21 … -
I think this is definitely a worthy point of heated debate. We don’t want a gov to do things on our behalf that we don’t agree w/. There needs to be some type of check on our clandestine agencies both to hold them to account & to keep the public trust. We need them...
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
No. Next question.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Same for
@guardian@BuzzFeed@cnn@msnbc Arresting@Wikileaks#JulianAssange Sets a precedent on what will happen to the press if they post stolen docs!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Follow
@aaronjmate on this and you’ll learn what the charging docs state.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
journalists are all julian assange. https://consortiumnews.com/2018/08/04/journalists-are-all-julian-assange/ …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.