This is the most stunning comment I've heard a news executive say. If as journalists you're not equipped to investigate, what exactly is it that you? Just regurgitate what the actual "investigators" (CIA, FBI, Homeland Security) tell you?https://twitter.com/brianstelter/status/1110382144390656000 …
-
-
Replying to @JordanChariton
Most everyone else knows exactly what he was talking about -- that journalists aren't federal investigators with Mueller type powers.
62 replies 0 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @brianstelter @JordanChariton
I also find it weird that folks who purport to be sceptical about the state and its actors have swallowed whole, a summary of a report no one has seen, from a Trump partisan put in place to run interference. Come to think of it, it figures.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @oringordon @brianstelter
Swallow hole? Barr quoted directly from Mueller on the CORE charge and reason for the investigation—collusion. Do you actually think Barr misquoted Mueller or is lying about what Mueller concluded?
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @JordanChariton @brianstelter
..& the initial subject of an inquiry isn't necessarily the most egregious thing. Was Bill Clinton charged in relation to Whitewater? You simply do not know enough to take a victory lap on Donald Trump's behalf.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @oringordon @brianstelter
You’re not paying attention to what I’m saying. I WANT TO SEE THE REPORT. Just bc Mueller found no collusion doesn’t mean Trump is off the hook/there isn’t bad stuff in there. My point—the COLLUSION conspiracy needs to be squashed. Denying Mueller concluded so is nuts
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
I would like to see the report to find out WHY he concluded there was no collusion. But the people refusing to accept that’s what he concluded are blinded by Trump derangement
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.