Journalists like @Sulliview and INDIGNANT blowhards like @JoeNBC are missing the forrest for the trees in their righteous defense of the media coverage of #RussiaGate. I (and I think I can say @mtaibbi @aaronjmate and others) aren't criticizing journalists who INVESTIGATED
-
-
So these media outlets ABSOLUTELY should have covered crimes related to Flynn, Cohen, Manafort and the rest....but covering those is VERY different from pushing a narrative storyline of the "walls are closing in" on Trump related to "Russian Collusion."
Show this thread -
Consider this for a moment: the
@guardian STILL has a story up that reports Julian Assange met with Paul Manafort during the campaign. This is a story EVERY OUTLET I've mentioned ran with to portray collusion. The problem: IT'S NOT SUPPORTED BY ANY FACTS OR PROOF.Show this thread -
There are countless other false stories still to this day up online that pushed Russian collusion. So spare me the false righteous indignation....I, nor others who've been proven right, are pushing Trump's "Fake News." I don't think journalists are "enemies of the people." But I
Show this thread -
do think most of the aforementioned outlets pushed a narrative that wasn't supported by EVIDENCE which was easy to see with the most basic amount of research. This sloppiness (which was intentional from the likes of
@maddow) misled viewers and readers. Journalists should be heldShow this thread -
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.