So you’re only a “serious” journalist when you work at a legacy outlet like the @washingtonpost? Same outlet who reported Russia hacked Vermont’s electrical grid (total lie) and wrote 16 negative pieces on @BernieSanders in 1 day? Got it!https://twitter.com/jonathanlkrohn/status/1109895341678231553?s=21 …
-
-
Jordan, are you a shill or a proposition player?
@JonathanLKrohn raised a serious issue. And this was an absurd retort.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @JonQFrench @washingtonpost and
A shill for what? I am still not understanding what point he is even raising? Bc I am an openly progressive journalist that makes me a “schill” and unethical? Than just about 75% of today’s journalists are both of those things!
1 reply 0 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @JordanChariton @JonQFrench and
No. Because you jumped from one extreme to another. That’s the point.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JonathanLKrohn @JordanChariton and
Please state specifically what Jordan did. As with Russiagate, otherwise it's fake news..
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @tates5a @JordanChariton and
Okay, here he is lying about chemical weapons in Syria. Confirmed by reporters such as
@leloveluck and@kshaheen on-the-ground: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bkcPsdtUQWU&feature=youtu.be … Here he is promoting noted-charlatan Rania Khalek on Syria over on-the-ground reporters:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xt2U7cnHbGc …2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JonathanLKrohn @tates5a and
can you explain what exactly is untrue from this interview? Inspectors did not find chemical weapons were used in Douma attack last year (the media rushed to claim Assad has gassed his people again when inspectors didn't even go in)
1 reply 0 retweets 9 likes -
-
Replying to @JordanChariton @JonathanLKrohn and
I have openly said many times I think it's clear Assad was responsible for gas attacks in beginning of the Syria War but I didn't see evidence of such in last year's Douma attack. What in God's name are you even talking about?
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @JordanChariton @tates5a and
You "didn't see evidence" because you chose to only listen to partisan hacks who know nothing about what they're talking about and have been routinely discredited by journalists working in Syria and the surrounding regions. This is what I'm talking about.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Jonathan---the INSPECTORS and @nytimes concluded there was no signs of a chemical attack in Douma....not ME. WHAT EVIDENCE are you even talking about ?https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/01/world/middleeast/syria-chlorine-douma-report.html …
-
-
Replying to @JordanChariton @tates5a and
This literally says: "...the cumulative evidence, presented in the report released by the [OPCW] provided 'reasonable grounds that the use of a toxic chemical as a weapon took place.'" Where does it say no attack happened???
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.