I recall being on this panel as well—where Cenk said Russia “swung the election.” Interesting revisionist history going on.https://twitter.com/mtracey/status/1109869394228903942?s=21 …
-
-
Replying to @JordanChariton
ok but the claims "Russia swung the election" and "Trump did not collude" are discrete and not mutually exclusive. They can both be true without inconsistency
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @houdini73
Read the exit polls in Wisconsin, Michigan, Ohio, and Pennsylvania like any actual political commentator or journalist has the ability to. Trade and immigration were biggest factors in Trump’s victories there—Russia doesn’t even make top 10 list
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @JordanChariton
ugh, this is getting messy. My observation was that you conflated two claims that weren't identical....not an argument for the veracity of either statement. Having said that, the impact of Russian interference can't be measured by asking voters who weren't aware it was going on
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
To be clear, as far I observed while at TYT (haven't paid attention to them after)--Cenk often claimed there was evidence of collusion between Trump campaign and Russia. Doesn't make him a bad person. Just means he was wrong. It's as simple as acknowledging that & moving on
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.