When the digital history books are written on @maddow and other Cold War 2.0 enthusiasts twisting themselves into pretzels for “collusion”—it will also show that @wikileaks & Julian Assange—who have a 100% accuracy record—was made a Russian accomplice w/ ZERO concrete evidence
-
-
Nor have you provided proof of all these mythical cutouts you allege exist between the GRU & Wikileaks. Absent such proof, the only reasonable inference is that Russian military intelligence directly passed the hacked emails to Assange. That’s how circumstantial evidence works.
-
Huh? So the standard is now for people to prove a negative? Do you realize how ridiculous it sounds that I or anyone would have to prove something DIDN’T HAPPEN when there is no proof it did? That’s why it’s on the prosecution to prove a crime
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I am doing my radio show live right now... but read the report and ask why did
@BarackObama bring sanctions for it? -
No evidence has been provided that Russia hacked emails - just assertions by Intel agencies that have been accepted as true ... VIPS has provided strong evidence it was a local download and not a hack. Keep at it Jordan!!
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.