When the digital history books are written on @maddow and other Cold War 2.0 enthusiasts twisting themselves into pretzels for “collusion”—it will also show that @wikileaks & Julian Assange—who have a 100% accuracy record—was made a Russian accomplice w/ ZERO concrete evidence
-
-
Russia hacked the emails. Wikileaks related them. There’s a thing in law called “circumstantial evidence.” Look it up.
-
So you think you can come to a conclusion that the Russian govt provided
@wikileaks emails based on circumstantial evidence that is gleened from your own personal bias? We’re in trouble if that’s the new standard for truth - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
IC couldn’t make a finding, on that issue bc they govt never inspected the servers & had only hearsay by a private firm w/ COI issues, who couldn’t make a definitive finding itself. Tip: Circumstantial doesn’t mean unsupported speculation
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.