Folks hired elsewhere (some creating websites with their resumes; etc) shows the media’s higher priority/concern for things that AFFECT THEM. Do you see these same journalists as vigilant when GM wrongly lays off 15,000 workers, tweeting up a storm or talking about finding folks
-
-
Show this thread
-
Jobs? What about Sears? Or fill-in-the-blank working class outlet. This doesn’t mean that currently employes journalists shouldn’t advocate for their colleagues being laid off to be hired elsewhere. But it is telling the hyper vigilance for our own versus the passive coverage of
Show this thread -
The controlled demolition of the middle class these same journalists just write up as another headline with very little follow-up and/or concern
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
There may some good wordsmiths. but their job was activism, not journalism. Clicks over content. Essentially, becoming "rage bait" farms - serving special interests with harassment campaigns. This business model is not sustainable.
-
@BuzzFeed@voxdotcom@VICE@MotherJones@thedailybeast@DailyCaller@dailykos - all checkout counter, political trash. Verizon just took a 4.6 BILLION loss on@HuffPost - Please, stop feeding these bears!
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.