THREAD: Finally got time 2 read Mueller hacking indictment (been consumed w/ a separate story I'm working on). It's quite a document that states A LOT of disconcerting, SPECIFIC things AS FACT without providing supporting evidence to prove those facts. Presumably, Mueller would..
-
-
and even likely all of Mueller's indictment is true..but without supporting evidence (especially explanations of forensic evidence) for his accusations, journalists and the public are essentially left to simply take their word for it. I simply reject the HERD MENTALITY to take..
Show this thread -
a prosecutor or intelligence agency's word for ANYTHING without providing evidence--that kind of thinking has led to disastrous wars and suffering in the Middle East (and for U.S. families who lost soldiers for no good reason). I hope Mueller's final report provides specifics..
Show this thread -
this indictment doesn't. If you want to lambast me for not joining the echo chamber saying "America was attacked" and all the rest---so be it. But I won't apologize, as a journalist, for not simply believing what a prosecutor writes as gospel...especially one that lied under..
Show this thread -
oath in 2000s about Iraqi Weapons of Mass Destruction.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Not exactly there Jordan. Remember the internet research agency indictments? Where the lawyers for said company showed up and requested discovery, and Muller did something unprecedented for prosecutor, he asked the judge to prospone the hearing.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.