Note the discordance between the headline's claims that they found proof that chlorine was used in an attack and the actual report report which says they only found traces of chlorine at 2 sites. They did not conclude that these traces represented a chlorine attack.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They found evidence of chlorine gas used. And they found evidence of nerve gas in precious incidents. You’re either an idiot or willfully misleading your audience who you hope are too stupid to read through.
-
What Danny said
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
And NOBODY is talking about this..big surprise in today's media
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No, you jackass. The media is reporting what it had from the start and has now been confirmed by the OPCW. That a prohibited chemical weapon was used to kill dozens of innocent people in a residential neighborhood. Spin away, fascist swine.
-
Wasn't the use of chemical weapons by the Regime been proven in prior instances by the same organization? Do the same people using the findings in this case as a proof of Assad innocence, admit his guilt on the previous ones based on findings by same organization?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@maddow,,,@tedlieu ,,,@RepAdamSchiff .. what do you folks have to say about this?#BREAKING..#NATO --our day isn't just about the#ScotusPick ,,arm yourselves w/ all truths.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.