And like I already said, the last census...which is what gives you the population size, Flint has 102,000 people. Hence at least 50 samples needed to be taken to satisfy the lead and copper rule.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Replying to @JordanChariton @johnson90909
The most recent round of testing, by MSU, had more than 90 samples. The sampling methods have their faults — as the scientists admit — but Flint’s water has been more rigorously rested than water in any other city. All that allows the government to say is it’s “as safe”
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ArthurDelaneyHP @johnson90909
You mean the sampling that relies on the same faulty methods as the others, i.e. not being certain they are actually testing homes connected to lead service lines and relying on old records written on index cards?
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Arthur—HuffPo has a budget. Why don’t you come to Flint and 1) speak with residents about how their water was tested like I just did. You will be SHOCKED at what you find 2) taste the water yourself like I just did (and the coffee). Tell me what u think if u don’t spit out first
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Arthur has a history of regurgitating Edwards' attacks on others. I have emails of quotes sent from Flint residents TWO YEARS AGO that Delaney failed to include in his Edwards support articles. He knowingly posted false accusations and hearsay= sad
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
I quoted you! Hi, by the way
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I am only one resident. Out of how many you were sent?!? Also, you only used 1 piece of my full quote. I was very disappointed in your writing. You asked me to get input from Flint residents, I did but they didn't fit your narrative, so you ignored them and spun your bias
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes
I know all about Arthur’s stenography for Edwards. I’m sure he will cover 60+ residents and non residents filing a complaint against Edwards—including Edwards own colleague at VT, right?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.